 |


by John Kostka Staff Writer
The Order comes across as an attempt at a return to the bygone days of
horror, when films were serious, somber and brooding rather than loud, fast
and violent. This is a noble aspiration, to be sure, and the fact that the
film doesn't achieve it...is sort of a shame. At least its heart was in the
right place...
The story follows the quest of a young New York priest Alex Bernier
(Heath Ledger, attempting to remain constantly brooding-yet-adorable) who is
one of the last remaining members of an obscure order of priests that
specializes in dealing with the supernatural. When the head of his order is
found dead in Rome, Alex is sent there to investigate the mysterious
circumstances surrounding the death.
Of course, it would be foolish not to use Mr. Ledger to his full
audience-drawing potential, so he is quickly given a girlfriend before
shipping off for Rome. She is Mara, an escapee from a mental institution (put there
for trying to stab Alex during her exorcism), and she is played by Shannyn
Sossamon, who is either not a very good actress or a master of
minimalism.
In Rome, Alex quickly discovers markings on the body of the head of his
order. These eventually lead him to the discovery of a "sin-eater," a
renegade priest who is able to take on the sins of others by performing a
special sacrament. It seems that this sin-eater (Benno Fürmann, of the
non-horror yet highly recommended, Princess and the Warrior) has been
roaming Italy, absolving, for a requisite price, damned and excommunicated
souls in order to get them into heaven.
It is after meeting the sin-eater that the movie starts to take a turn
for the worse. Basically, once Alex and the sin-eater are aware of each
other, Alex just follows the sin-eater around for about a half-hour while
the sin-eater tries to convince the young priest to take over his position.
Toward the end of the film, a rather uninteresting conspiracy is revealed,
and Alex is forced into a decision about whether to become the next
sin-eater or not, but by then it's really just a case of too little, too late.
I did my best to give this film a fair chance, and I will admit that
there were some things that I liked about it (which is more than a lot of
people seem willing to do). The gorgeous Italian locations are definitely a plus, and
are nicely captured by Nicola Pecorini's graceful camerawork.
I also give the film credit for trying to be a little more inventive than
an average supernatural thriller. TV previews, showcasing all the cheesy CGI and
shots of Heath Ledger holding out crosses while screaming at demons, give the
impression that the film is going to be more of a horror movie than it
actually is. In reality, this is barely a horror movie at all. It
certainly isn't scary, and it barely even tries to be. The Order is more
of a supernatural drama in the end, chronicling young Alex's relationship
with the sin-eater, and while the movie is never truly successful at making
this seem important, it is still a nobler aspiration than simply sending
hunky Heath out to squirt demons with Super-Soakers full of holy water.
Still, despite the movie's good intentions, it is bogged down by many
negative qualities. First and foremost, the attempt at an interesting
dynamic between Father Bernier and the sin-eater is undermined by the fact
that Bernier is little more than a stock character, and also by the fact
that we've never really been given a reason to be interested in his
conflict. Along with this, the film itself is rather patchy and confusing. The
religious conspiracy element seems to come in as an afterthought, and I
still don't understand what the "fate worse than death" that keeps being
referenced is. Is it becoming a sin-eater? If so, I would assume it is
"worse than death" because of the burden of carrying the sins of a thousand
men, yet the sin-eater never really lets on that this is particularly
painful for him. I won't go so far as to say that the "fate worse than
death" is the film itself (that would be an extremist reaction and a cheap
shot), but it is obvious after viewing, that this is definitely a flawed
picture.
While the film may have its problems, the DVD itself isn't too bad of a
package. The film is presented in both 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen and
1.33:1 fullscreen. Word is that the movie was shot full frame, and I am
willing to believe this. Interesting, however, is that after a comparison
between the widescreen and fullscreen
versions it becomes obvious that the fullscreen does not necessarily provide
more picture. The fullscreen image seems to gain information at the top of
the frame while losing information from the sides. I suppose it's a toss-up
as to which to watch, though I presume most everyone here will be choosing
the letterboxed transfer. This was the one that I watched, and it seemed
pretty good, with nice rendering of the beautiful Italian landscapes,
etc.
As for extras, we are given several things. First, of course, is the
obligatory trailer, which is full frame. Next comes a group of largely
unnecessary deleted scenes that are only moderately interesting. We are
given director's commentary with all of these scenes as well, which provides
some occasionally interesting information as to the reasons behind their
omission.
Along with the deleted scenes, we are given dailies from a scene where
Bernier finds Mara, his girlfriend, with her wrists slit.
This feature wasnât particularly interesting, as it basically consists of
watching Mr. Ledger perform the same scene about ten damn times, when once
in the movie was more than enough. I personally found the dailies more
irritating than anything, as they just consist of Alex crawling all over
Mara while making sounds that seem to be indicating severe
gastrointestinal distress rather than intense emotional suffering.
Finally, we are given a feature-length commentary by the director, Brian
Helgeland, which isn't particularly interesting. He discusses various
influences for the project and spends a good deal of time pointing out
behind the scenes info (e.g. who painted the pictures in the background,
etc.) that's really not of much interest to anyone. I suppose the discussion of his influences could have been interesting, yet I find, as a general rule, commentaries
where the creator is more enthusiastic about the film than the viewer tend
to come off rather poorly. This one is no exception.
So, all in all, what of The Order? It's not as bad as you may hear in
some circles, though it's not particularly good, either. To its credit, it
does attempt to be a different, more meditative kind of horror flick, but in
the end, I can't recommend it solely based on its aspirations. It might be
worth a rental if you're particularly intrigued about observing the dynamic
between Bernier and the sin-eater; however, I would probably advise most
everyone else (aside from the Heath Ledger fans, of course) to look
elsewhere for an evening's entertainment. In the end, it's true that you can do worse...but you can also do a lot better, too.

|
 |
 |