 |


by Bradley Harding Senior Staff Writer
“Love is a flower that needs peace to grow, but if shades of fear are
all we know, then we’re losers… losers.”
-Excrutiating theme song to “The Losers” by Stu Phillips.
This curious war film from 1970 is one of the stranger exploitation
titles from that era. Sort of a low-rent combination of “The Dirty
Dozen” and “The Wild Bunch,” “The Losers” wants to be several things to
its prospective audience. It wants to be an antiestablishment biker
film; a sex and drugs exploitation film; alpha male action film; and
scathing anti-war film. Such high aspirations - and “Invasion of the
Bee Girls’ William Smith too! It’s Vietnam 1969 (actually Cambodia in
the film – and shot in the Philippines just to add to the confusion).
The war is still raging and explosions and gunfire continuously pepper
the jungle. CIA operative Chet Davis (director Jack Starrett) has been
captured and is being held in a Red Chinese compound. A secret rescue
mission is quickly set into action with five members of a tough biker
gang called the Devil’s Advocates.
The gang, a few of which are Vietnam vets, is comprised of leader Link
(Smith), Duke (Adam Roarke), Limpy (Paul Koslo), Speed (Eugene
Cornelius) and Dirty Denny (Houston Savage). The plan is to have the
gang retrofit some Yamaha bikes with guns and armor and then storm the
compound and rescue the agent. Though Link has had some issues with the
CIA operative in the past, he is deemed the perfect leader for this
mission. The road to the actual rescue is a long one as the vets travel
through the war ravaged land drinking, smoking, screwing and mindlessly
bar-brawling. Duke’s real motives for joining the mission are revealed
when he breaks away from the group’s debauched spree to see Suriya
(Lillian Margarejo). The two met and fell in love during his original
tour of duty and he’s determined to take her back to America with him.
Limpy falls quickly for a beautiful Vietnamese prostitute with a mixed,
African American baby. After meandering for almost over an hour, the
bikes have been transformed and the rescue is set into motion. But who
will survive and what will be left of them?
“The Losers” was directed by the late Jack Starrett who made some great
action and exploitation titles in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s; “Cleopatra
Jones,” “Race with the Devil” and “Slaughter” were far better films
than they had any right to be. Starrett was always able to get solid
performances from his casts and, more importantly, could really deliver
the action set pieces. (He was also a seasoned character actor, which
might explain his ability to coax strong performances from his actors.)
“The Losers” delivers on these two elements in spades with a great cast
and some truly incredible action scenes. The opening moments of the
film skillfully capture a frenzied battle scene. Given the small
budget, it’s amazing how complex and exciting it’s realized. The film’s
script, however, is a mess with a meandering structure that is
essentially 70 minutes of build-up, fifteen minutes of explosions and
another ten minutes of anti-climax. Writer Alan Caillou has written
some superior exploitation films as well, including the drive-in
favorite “Kingdom of the Spiders.” For a film like “The Losers” to work
properly, the high concept has to be supported by at least a little
character development.
Films like “The Dirty Dozen” worked because the writers took the time
to establish the characters and their relationships; the audience had a
vested interest in the outcome. It is never quite clear what the
relationship is between these renegade bikers (aside from their
Advocate affiliation) or why they chose to take on this mission. It’s
almost as if Caillou was aware that this story had already been told -
and didn’t feel the need to explore anything beyond the bare
essentials. Another problem is that however slight the characters are,
their indifference to the whole task at hand becomes tiresome. If they
had been coerced into the job through black mail, at least their
boorish, lackadaisical behavior might have made sense. It’s ultimately
difficult to care about the story when the leads seem so indifferent to
their task at hand. The anti war message also falls to pieces in the
end, given how little time is spent getting to know the characters.
Ultimately, it is just an exploitation film – and if viewed with this
mind it does offer mild distraction.
The cast is solid, especially Smith as the biker leader. His character
is, ironically, one of the sketchiest of the bunch but his performance
hits just the right note of amiable male bravado. It’s a great
precursor to the buff Arnold Schwarzenegger-type of roles that would
permeate the action films of the ‘80’s. He would go on to make several
great exploitation films including the aforementioned “Bee Girls” and
“Grave of the Vampire.” Roarke is also good as the romantic lead Duke,
though he’s given some of the worst dialogue. His tender scenes with
his Vietnamese girlfriend are embarrassing to watch. Though the pseudo
love montage with inappropriate theme song (see above) doesn’t help
matters. Koslo as Limpy gives the only authentic performance, but his
character is given the most nuance. His relationship with the
prostitute is quite touching (in drive-in terms).
This DVD release by Dark Sky Films gets major points for an interesting
commentary by actors Smith and Koslo who add an interesting insight
into the difficult production. Koslo is especially fun to listen to;
his enthusiasm and long memory make the action onscreen far more
involving in retrospect. The film itself is presented in its original
1.85:1 ratio in a wonderful remastered print. It both looks and sounds
great; the Dolby Digital mix especially impressive. The extras include
the engaging commentary, a photo gallery, radio spots and trailer. The
trailer adds great insight into the marketing of this strange film.
Apparently, the distributor had no idea how to sell it. It’s as
meandering and unfocussed as the film itself. Bonus points for the
inclusion of the trailer for the cult classic “Werewolves on Wheels.”
It’s a terrible print, but it’s great fun to watch - and there is no
mistaking what’s in store as far as that title is concerned.

|
 |
 |