 |


by John Kostka Staff Writer
I have to wonder exactly what it means that Texas Chainsaw Massacre is
now not only considered old enough to be remade, but old enough to be
re-vamped entirely. Sure, I can understand Steve Martin in an updating of
Cyrano de Bergerac. I can even accept (though not necessarily endure)
Leonardo DiCaprio in a post-modernist Romeo & Juliet; however, these are
centuries-old works being updated. Is TCM really in need of a reworking /
homage after only three decades? Eric Stacey apparently thinks so, and
thus we have Director's Cut.
Allow me to catch you up. Director's Cut opens with a nice, moody
scene in which a family sits, tied to chairs, at a table. (I'm assuming they're
probably supposed to be in the dining room, though it appears this scene was
shot on a soundstage and so in the end they are really just in a black,
nebulous void.) The aforementioned fact that they are tied to chairs
immediately tips us off that something is not right, and the fact that a
madman is strolling around the group talking about the murders he is going
to commit only confirms our fears. Indeed, it's not long before blood
begins to flow and the credits begin to roll.
Following this prologue, we meet Brittany
(Kathleen Taylor), a pretty teen who is headed out to Hollywood with some
friends in hopes of finding fame and fortune. As she prepares to leave, her
mother, having just seen a report on the opening scene's murder on TV, warns
her not to go; it should come as little surprise that Brittany has set out
on the road toward Hollywood by the end of this exchange. Along with her,
she is driving her boyfriend Mark (David Hunter), her friend Courtney
(Molly Michelle), and Courtney's boyfriend Twiggy
(Cradeaux Alexander, whose name gives me pangs of envy).
Stopping at a roadside rest stop, the group meets Meth (Evan
McNamara); Brittany takes pity on him and convinces the others to give him a
lift. They soon regret their decision, however, when he begins talking
about stabbing himself with a screwdriver and making threatening comments
(are we beginning to see the TCM parallels?). Forcing Meth out of the car,
the group resumes its journey, and, by that evening, ends up at the house of
the notorious B-movie director Cole Wilder (Joe Jeffrey). What makes Cole
so interesting is not only that he is the son of a famous movie director who
was killed in a situation terribly similar to the opening sequence of this
film, but also the fact that he is not socializing at his party but rather
hiding on the second floor videotaping the proceedings.
Of course, none of this registers in the tiny brains of our vapid young
leads, and they simply wander about Wilder's party, schmoozing with industry
bigwigs and trying to get ahead. It's no surprise that a couple of them
sneak off to have some sex (sorry guys, no T, just A, and
I'm willing to bet only about one in ten of you will find it gratifying) and
that, post-coitus, they are murdered. As the night wears on, the party begins to
thin, and Brittany soon realizes, much to her chagrin, that all of her
friends are missing. Going to search for them, she finally encounters the
mysterious Cole, who seems quite charming until he starts trying
to kill her. Finding her friends dead (at least, I'm pretty sure they're
dead, despite cadaver-Courtney's tendency to blink), she runs screaming from
the house in true Marilyn Burns fashion. Of course it's little surprise
that she's dragged back, and more sadistic hijinks ensue. Meth appears,
having hitched a ride and killed the driver, and so the whole demented
family of cineastes begins tormenting Brittany until she escapes yet again,
and...
Well, things basically collapse at the end. The family just runs around
chasing a screaming Brittany through the streets of Hollywood until the film
stops, achieving one of the most abrupt conclusions since American Werewolf
in London. This problem of disjointedness and confusion plagues
Director's Cut, which, in general, seems unable to decide whether it wants
to be a parody, an homage, or an actual horror film. The packaging claims
that it is a loving tribute to TCM and a send-up of slasher pictures in
general. While it is, at times, rather amusing and does, at other times,
evoke fond memories of horror classics past, the inability of Director's
Cut to stay one course and carry it out causes it to seem rather
scatter-shot in its style. Still, there's a fair amount of good to be found
in this production, and I think it's only fair to mention it before I fully
begin my whining.
For starters, Director's Cut is definitely a professional-looking
production, with a fairly sizeable cast, acting that never causes more than
a slight grimace, and a slick look (perhaps too slick... those pointless
split-screens get annoying fast). In addition to this, the film does
have some nice gore and many well-executed scenes, particularly the
prologue. Also, I'd like to praise Marian Zapico's portrayal of Cole's sexy
wife, Katrina. She turned what could have been a grating and
one-dimensional character into a fairly well developed and interesting
personage. I'd like to see more of this pretty and talented young woman in
the future.
What hobbles these effective elements is, as mentioned before, the film's
inability to jell into a coherent and satisfying whole. Shifts in mood are
too abrupt, particularly during stalking-killing sequences. For instance,
at one point, Courtney is being chased by the killer and, in a rather
amusing occurrence, is caught after she becomes entangled in power
cords while trying to run. However, in the next scene she is tied to a
chair and cruelly murdered with an electric drill. Either of
these scenes would have been effective if a stylistic tone were consistent
throughout the movie. However, placing them next to each other causes a
jarring tonal shift that is nothing short of distracting.
Scripting is also not a strong suit in Director's Cut, and this causes a
good deal of scenes to become rather ridiculous. In the opening scene, for
instance, as Brittany's mother tries to convince Brittany to stay home, she
goes from demanding that Brittany stay, to begging her to threatening her in
the space of a few sentences. Such weirdly violent mood swings make these
exchanges seem flat out ridiculous. Of course, I suppose an argument could
be made that this is perhaps intentional and is part of the film's parody;
however, I saw little evidence in the rest of the movie that would indicate
that it was operating on such a high satirical plane.
As spoken of before, the movie also loses control of itself toward its
ending, as though production suddenly became very rushed. We realize that
several characters (a producer, an actor, etc.) have been very poorly
developed, as they seem to simply sit and watch the family torment Brittany,
and then randomly take a side, for or against the carnage. I found this all
rather dumbfounding and it left me with a lot of questions as to these
charactersâ relation to this crazy family and as to exactly what logic is
dictating their actions. Sadly, these questions were never really answered,
making the conclusion seem all the more unsatisfying.
Similarly, our mad auteur's plan of creating a realistic horror movie by
filming his actors at the party and then murdering them is a seriously
flawed premise. Exactly who, I have to wonder, would be willing to buy a
movie that, for no apparent reason, has security-cam-style
footage and little to no plot? While I could see a market for a snuff
film, the movie makes it clear (a surprising change of pace) that Cole
intends his product to function as a mainstream slasher picture.
The root of problem with Director's Cut is that it attempts to do too
much in one movie. Not only does it want to simultaneously satirize and pay
homage to the slasher sub-genre, but it also attempts to parody the reality
TV craze through Cole's voyeuristic filming of his party's guests and his
victims AND it tries to comment on the vanity of Hollywood directors,
producers, and stars. With all of these noble aspirations, it becomes
particularly frustrating that, in the final fifteen minutes, the movie
basically abandons all of these goals and reverts to a tried-and-true
'chased by maniacs' sequence.
If the film itself is a bit of a mess, at least it is fairly enjoyable
and professionally done. On that note, it is presented capably on this DVD
in a non-anamorphic 1.85:1 transfer that looks clean and clear. Landfall
Productions seems willing to play along with the movie's purported
tongue-in-cheek spirit as evidenced by the amusing warning that
plays when the disc is inserted, and I think it's nice that the producers
tried to live up to the spirit of their product.
While the DVD is technically fine, however, its content is definitely
lacking. Included on the disk are an over-long and uninvolving trailer and
a feature called 'Commentary' that consists of an unidentified person (I'm
assuming director Stacey, but it's just a guess) talking about the general
goals of the film over about four minutes of footage from the movie.
In the end, Director's Cut is an affable if terribly disjointed little
horror-comedy that has more than enough style and craft going for it but not
nearly enough substance. If you're desperate for a slasher flick you could
do a lot worse, but if you're looking for a film that will really make you
believe in the power of independent cinema, you'd best continue your
search.

|
 |
 |